Document Type: Research paper

Authors

1 Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 1. Department of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran 2. Drought Research center, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

By applying multivariate statistical analysis, this research aimed to estimate the heritability and find relationships between the vegetative and reproductive characteristics of Prunus scoparia and Prunus elaeagnifolia. Twenty genotypes of each species were selected randomly from cultivated populations and twenty-two traits including the tree, leaf, flower, nut and kernel attributes were measured. Results showed that there were high levels of genotypic and phenotypic variations among the genotypes of both species. Many of the measurements pertaining to the leaf, flower, nut and kernel, showed very high heritability (H2 >90%) in both species, whilst some traits such as shoot diameter in P. scoparia and kernel moisture in both species had very lower heritability (H2 <50%). Generally, the heritability of measured traits in P. elaeagnifolia were higher than those of P. scoparia, especially foreconomically important traits including yield (H2 = 94 and H2 = 54.61, respectively in P. elaeagnifolia and P. scoparia), nut weight (H2 = 97.83 and H2 = 85.39.61, respectively in P. elaeagnifolia and P. scoparia) and oil percentage (H2 = 75.55 and H2 = 61.43, respectively in P. elaeagnifolia and P. scoparia). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that the most influential factors on yield of P. scoparia, were the fruit set, flower diameter and leaf length, whilst for the P. elaeagnifolia, the yield was mostly determined by fruit set and leaf area. The high genetic diversity and heritability of the studied traits, indicates high genetic potential of this germplasm to be utilized in future breeding programs.

Keywords

  1. Anumalla M, Roychowdhury R, Geda C.K, Mazid M, Rathoure A.K. 2015. Utilization of plant genetic resources and diversity analysis tools for sustainable crop improvement with special emphasis on rice. International Journal 3,1155-1175.
  2. Atanasov A.G, Waltenberger B, Pferschy-Wenzig E.M, Linder T, Wawrosch C, Uhrin P, Temml V, Wang L, Schwaiger S, Heiss E.H, Rollinger J.M, Schuster D, Breuss J.M, Bochkov V, Mihovilovic M.D, Kopp B, Bauer R, Dirsch V.M, Stuppner H. 2015. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: a review Biotechnology advances 33,1582-1614.
  3. Chandrababu R, Sharma R. 1999. Heritability estimates in almond [Prunus dulcis (Miller) DA Webb]. Scientia Horticulturae 79, 237-243.
  4. Cohen, J.I, Williams, J.T, Plucknett D.L, Shands H. 1991. Ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources: global development and environmental concerns. Science, 253(5022), 866-872.
  5. Colic S, Rakonjac V, Zec G, Nikolic D, Aksic M.F. 2012. Morphological and biochemical evaluation of selected almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) DA Webb] genotypes in northern Serbia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 36, 429-438.
  6. Cruz C.D. 2013. Genes: a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 35, 271-276.
  7. Dicenta F, Garcia J. 1992. Phenotypical correlations among some traits in almond. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 46, 241-246.
  8. Dicenta F, García J, Carbonell E. 1993. Heritability of flowering, productivity and maturity in almond. Journal of Horticultural science 68,113-120.
  9. Dvin S.R, Eshghi S, Avanzato D, Ansari A. 2017. Diversity in the nut and kernel characteristics of seven populations of Prunus scoparia from the central and southern Zagros regions of Iran by comparison with three other almond species. FRUITS 72, 370-381.

9.

10. Falconer D.S, Mackay T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, Ronald Press, New York.

11. Farshadfar E, Farshadfar M, Sutka J. 2001. Combining ability analysis of drought tolerance in wheat over different water regimes. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 48, 353-361.

12. Gharaghani A, Solhjoo S, Oraguzie N. 2017. A review of genetic resources of almonds and stone fruits (Prunus spp.) in Iran. Genet. Resur. Crop Evol. 64, 611-640.

13. Gharaghani A, Eshghi S. 2015 Prunus scoparia, a Potentially Multi-Purpose Wild Almond Species in Iran. Acta Hortic. 1074, 67-72.

14. Hazel L.N. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28, 476-490.

15. Holsinger K.E, Weir B.S. 2009. Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F ST. Nature Reviews Genetics 10(9), 639-650.

16. Imani A, Shamili M. 2018. Almond nut weight assessment by stepwise regression and path analysis. International Journal of Fruit Science 18 (3), 1-6.

17. Institute S. 2003. SAS version 9.3. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

18. Karimi H, Zamani Z, Ebadi A, Fatahi M. 2009. Morphological diversity of Pistacia species in Iran. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56, 561-571.

19. Kester D, Hansche P, Beres V, Asay R. 1977. Variance components and heritability of nut and kernel traits in almond. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science 102, 264-266.

20. Khadivi-Khub A, Anjam K. 2014. Morphological characterization of Prunus scoparia using multivariate analysis. Plant systematics and evolution 300,1361-1372.

21. Kiani S, Rajabpoor S, Sorkheh K, Ercisli S. 2015. Evaluation of seed quality and oil parameters in native Iranian almond (Prunus L. spp.) species. Journal of forestry research 26, 115-122.

22. Mars M, Marrakchi M. 1999. Diversity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) germplasm in Tunisia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46, 461-467.

23. Nikoumanesh K, Ebadi A, Zeinalabedini M, Gogorcena Y. 2011. Morphological and molecular variability in some Iranian almond genotypes and related Prunus species and their potentials for rootstock breeding. Scientia horticulturae 129, 108-118.

24. Pinar H, Unlu M, Ercisli S, Uzun A, Bircan M. 2016. Genetic analysis of selected almond genotypes and cultivars grown in Turkey using peroxidase-gene-based markers. Journal of forestry research 27, 747-754.

25. Riasat M, Pessarakli M, Niaz A.A, Saed-Moucheshi A. 2018. Assessment of different wheat genotypes with altered genetic background in response to different salinity levels. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33, 1-13.

26. Richards R, Rebetzke G, Condon A, Van Herwaarden A. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop science 42, 111-121.

27. Saed-Moucheshi A, Fasihfar E, Hasheminasab H, Rahmani A, Ahmadi A. 2013. A review on applied multivariate statistical techniques in agriculture and plant science. Int J Agron Plant Produc 4, 127-141.

28. Sorkheh K, Shiran, B,  Rouhi V,  Asadi E,  Jahanbazi H,  Moradi H,  Gradziel T.M,  Martínez-Gómez P. 2009. Phenotypic diversity within native Iranian almond (Prunus spp.) species and their breeding potential. Genetic resources and crop evolution 56, 947-961.

29. Xiong J.S, Ding J, Li Y. 2015. Genome-editing technologies and their potential application in horticultural crop breeding. Horticulture research 2, 15019. doi:10.1038/hortres.2015.19.

30. Zeinalabedini M, Majidian P, Dezhampour J, Khakzad M, Farsi M. 2016. First Report of a set of Genetic Identities in Prunus Rootstocks by SSR Markers. Journal of Plant Molecular Breeding 4, 17-25.

31. Zeinalabedini M, Sohrabi S, Nikoumanesh K, Imani A, Mardi M. 2012. Phenotypic and molecular variability and genetic structure of Iranian almond cultivars. Plant Systematics and Evolution 298, 1917-1929.